Reading in an Age of Distraction
We read more words than any generation in history and finish fewer of them whole. A reflection on what deep reading gives…
Opinion & Analysis Editor · Cubed News
editorials, columns, long reads
Helena Brandt edits opinion and analysis at Cubed News, the part of the publication where it stops merely reporting what happened and begins arguing about what it means. Her remit covers the unsigned editorials that carry the institution's own view, the bylined columns that carry an individual writer's, and the long reads that take the time a complicated subject deserves. She regards the opinion pages not as a relief from the rigour of the news desks but as a place where that rigour has to work even harder, because an argument has no facts to hide behind.
Her governing standard is that an opinion is only worth printing if it is built on something true. Brandt holds her columnists to the same factual discipline as any reporter: a piece may interpret, advocate and provoke, but it may not misstate. She has little patience for the contrarianism that mistakes being annoying for being interesting, or for the certainty that skips the strongest version of the other side's case. The columns she values most are the ones that change a reader's mind by reasoning rather than by volume.
On standards, she insists that analysis show its work. Where a column rests on a claim, the claim must be sourced and accurate; where it rests on a value, the value must be stated rather than smuggled in. She edits against the tics that make commentary cheap — the strawman, the unearned outrage, the conclusion announced before the argument arrives — and she treats the distinction between what the writer knows and what the writer merely believes as something the reader is entitled to see. Disclosure, to her, is part of honesty.
Brandt frames opinion through the publication's three dimensions, but turned inward: the context an argument must reckon with to be fair, the perspectives it has a duty to take seriously even in disagreement, and the stakes that make the question worth arguing about at all. Her conviction is that good opinion journalism is not the enemy of good reporting but its natural companion — the place where a publication thinks out loud, in public, and stands behind the thinking. Her work shapes the publication's opinion and analysis.
6 articles · [email protected]
We read more words than any generation in history and finish fewer of them whole. A reflection on what deep reading gives…
Granting anonymity is the most consequential favour a newsroom can do a source — and the most easily abused. A defence of…
Information became abundant and free; the thing it consumes did not. Understanding attention as the genuinely scarce resource explains more about the…
Most of what we know, we know at third hand — a summary of a summary of a claim no one traced.…
We are surrounded by confident forecasts and have learned almost nothing about which ones to believe. A case for treating uncertainty as…
The race to be first has quietly become the race to be wrong. A defence of journalism that waits, checks, and explains…